Hitching a ride, trusting a partner, marrying the same person three times
Subscribe and Save up to 45%
This selection is available to active subscribers only.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
Marvin W. Schwartz
The Sun has rarely done anything I truly hate, until now.
I hate that you published Marvin Schwartz’s photograph of an infant boy about to be circumcised by his Jewish elders [January 1998]. This photograph was nestled amidst other prayerful photographs of Jewish life, as if it were somehow equally holy. The baby lies peacefully in the arms of an old rabbi, oblivious to the fact that he is about to be sexually mutilated without his permission, by people who supposedly love him, in the name of some ancient “covenant with God.”
Indeed! No God I know would require me to sacrifice the foreskin of my clitoris against my will.
Would you have published a photograph of tribal African women holding a little girl about to be ritually circumcised? And if you did publish such a photograph, would it have been presented as just another lovely aspect of African life? Perhaps you join many traditional Jews — and many non-Jewish Westerners alike — in thinking that involuntary circumcision for boys is different. If so, you’re in need of some education.
If you’re truly interested in showing the truth, then how about publishing a photograph taken five minutes later, when the baby’s foreskin was being sliced off?
The photograph mentioned above is available as a PDF only. Click here to download.