Correspondence
I’m a huge fan of Michael Ableman’s work, but I was stopped short when, after he discussed the population problem, he mentioned that he and his wife had a new baby.
Though I understand that no one can walk the talk 100 percent of the time, I wonder why so many progressives seem to think they are personally exempt from addressing this particular dilemma in their own lives. We need more examples of a fully lived life without offspring. Perhaps each time we do not give life to a new human, we give that life, invisibly, to the planet.
Kathleen Edwards
San Anselmo, California
Michael Ableman responds:
To Kathleen Edwards: Almost everything I do has some element of compromise in it. Each time I get into an automobile, buy a new pair of boots, or even fill up the bathtub, I am contributing to the great unraveling. I was initially resistant to the idea of having another child. I had misgivings, too, before the birth of my first son twenty-one years ago. I was concerned about population and uncertain about my abilities as a parent. But raising my son was the very thing that turned me into an activist. Seeing this beautiful, pure being enter a perilous world made me want to change that world. Of course, not all activists need to have children to inspire them.
This whole blending of activism and humanity is tricky. No matter how conscientious we are in the U.S., we inevitably consume more than we are entitled to. But to abandon the joys of being human, or to analyze each one as some sort of tax on the earth, can be a subtle trap.
To Ilene Roizman: As Arnie Cooper said in the introduction to his interview, my wife and I now farm in British Columbia, Canada, not in southern California. We’ve had to give up growing avocados and citrus and eat fresh tomatoes and peppers — and, yes, strawberries — for a shorter time each year. During our first winter in British Columbia, I found myself standing sheepishly in the checkout line of the local grocery store with a head of California-grown organic lettuce concealed under my arm, as if I were buying a pornographic magazine.
Since then we have refined our skills and joined an increasing number of growers in cold climes who are using creativity and ingenuity to produce fresh foods throughout the year. (I know of one commercial farmer who grows food throughout the harsh Maine winter under cold frames and row covers without any electricity.) We have also rediscovered the art and the pleasure of drying, freezing, and canning. Cracking open a jar of homegrown pickles, or pesto, or pears, or plums during the peak of winter is an incredible experience. As an eater, I have come to prefer short bursts of seasonal pleasure. I can appreciate strawberries and corn and melons so much more when they aren’t available all the time.
We all pay dearly for our addiction to getting anything we want 365 days a year. We pay for it many times after we leave the checkout counter: with our health, with the health of the natural world, and with the loss of our sense of place.
I agree completely with Michael Ableman about the benefits of community-based food production, but I’m disappointed by his regional bias. It seems that whenever I hear someone advocating a diet of fresh, locally grown food, the speaker always lives in southern California, with its year-round growing season. It’s easy to wax poetic about field-fresh strawberries grown without chemicals when you can get them pretty much all the time. Where I live, the strawberry season lasts a precious few weeks in June.
When Cooper asked Ableman, “What can people who live in a cold climate . . . do?” Ableman’s response was vague and unsatisfactory. As much as I love potatoes, I don’t think I’d be happy making them the basis for my diet all winter, no matter how many varieties there are. And I think most people would agree that canned anything, no matter how it was grown, is nowhere near as good as fresh.
My kids and I buy most of our summer and fall produce from local farms. But the community-supported farm near where I live closes from Thanksgiving until spring. If I want to eat fresh vegetables in February, I have to buy what’s been trucked in from elsewhere, probably southern California.
Ilene Roizman
Sag Harbor, New York
I read Arnie Cooper’s interview with Michael Ableman [“Earthly Delights,” June 2003] on my way to meet a friend from college for our annual adventure. This year we were going to New York.
On a boat tour around Manhattan, we passed by the financial district. The tour guide directed our attention to where the World Trade Center had been and asked for a moment of silence.
During that moment, I thought of Ableman’s suggestion to build a community garden on the site where the towers once stood. I agree that, if there was ever a time to demonstrate to the rest of the world that Americans care about more than the size of our skyscrapers, it is now. My biggest fear is that we will rebuild the towers, to show the world our strength and resilience. I would much rather return to New York in a couple of years and hear the guide describe the garden that now produces life and nourishment within the financial district.
I hope the people of New York will seriously consider the concept of an urban garden at Ground Zero — for their own healing, and for the sake of the entire country.
Erika Sanders
Oak Harbor, Washington
More Letters